Base de datos - (CIANE) | |
Presentación de esta base de datos documental (Sitio web de CIANE) |
https://ciane.net/id=2782 | ➡ Editar este registro |
Ficha bibliográfica (sin autores) : | Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research - Vol. 40, 6 - p.1527-1533 |
Autores : | Lanka, S.; Surapaneni, T.; Nirmalan, P.K. |
Año de publicación : | 2014 |
URL(s) : | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Aim The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combined intracervical Foley catheter and low-dose vaginal misoprostol with low-dose vaginal misoprostol alone for induction of labor. Material and Methods This prospective non-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted over a 2-year period in 126 pregnant women planned for induction of labor at a tertiary care centre. Women at ≥28 gestational weeks with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation, intact membranes and a Bishop score of ≤4 were randomized for labor induction with either a combination of Foley catheter and misoprostol or only misoprostol. The primary outcome variable was the induction-to-delivery interval between the two groups. The secondary outcome variables included rate of vaginal deliveries, uterine hyperstimulation, cesarean section rate, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit admissions and chorioamnionitis. Results The mean induction-to-delivery interval and rate of vaginal deliveries were not significantly different between the groups (26.52 h in the combination group and 27.64 h in the misoprostol group, P = 0.65; 65.07% and 65.07%, respectively, P = 0.9). Uterine hyperstimulation and meconium-stained liquor were significantly more prevalent in the misoprostol group (P = 0.001). Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion The addition of Foley catheter to misoprostol did not cause any statistically significant benefit in reducing the induction-to-delivery time. However, it reduced the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and meconium-stained liquor. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : | |
Comentarios : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): |
|
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): | |
Palabras claves : | |
Autor de este registro : | Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017 |
Debate (mostrar sólo español) | ||
---|---|---|
Realizar otra consulta de expertos --- Realice otra consulta sencilla
Creación de un registro --- Importación de registros
Gestión de usuarios --- Salvaguardar la base de datos --- Contacto
Esta base de datos creada por la Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) está gestionada
por el Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
Se nutre de las contribuciones de voluntarios interesados en compartir información científica.
Si está de acuerdo con este proyecto, puede ayudarnos de varias maneras:
(1) convertirse en colaborador de esta base de datos, si tiene alguna experiencia en documentación
(2) ou apoio financeiro CIANE (veja abaixo)
(3) o hacerse miembro de otra asociación afiliada al CIANE.
➡ Inicie sesión o cree una cuenta para seguir los cambios o convertirse en editor.
➡ Contacta con bibli(arobase)ciane.net para más información.
Donar a CIANE (haga clic en 'Faire un don') nos ayudará a mantener y desarrollar sitios y bases de datos públicas para apoyar las decisiones informadas de los progenitores y profesionales de la salud con respecto al parto |