Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2782 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research - Vol. 40, 6 - p.1527-1533 |
Author(s) : | Lanka, S.; Surapaneni, T.; Nirmalan, P.K. |
Year of publication : | 2014 |
URL(s) : | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Aim The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combined intracervical Foley catheter and low-dose vaginal misoprostol with low-dose vaginal misoprostol alone for induction of labor. Material and Methods This prospective non-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted over a 2-year period in 126 pregnant women planned for induction of labor at a tertiary care centre. Women at ≥28 gestational weeks with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation, intact membranes and a Bishop score of ≤4 were randomized for labor induction with either a combination of Foley catheter and misoprostol or only misoprostol. The primary outcome variable was the induction-to-delivery interval between the two groups. The secondary outcome variables included rate of vaginal deliveries, uterine hyperstimulation, cesarean section rate, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit admissions and chorioamnionitis. Results The mean induction-to-delivery interval and rate of vaginal deliveries were not significantly different between the groups (26.52 h in the combination group and 27.64 h in the misoprostol group, P = 0.65; 65.07% and 65.07%, respectively, P = 0.9). Uterine hyperstimulation and meconium-stained liquor were significantly more prevalent in the misoprostol group (P = 0.001). Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion The addition of Foley catheter to misoprostol did not cause any statistically significant benefit in reducing the induction-to-delivery time. However, it reduced the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and meconium-stained liquor. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |