Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1024

Created on : 16 Nov 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Women’s attitude toward analgesia during labor—a comparison between 1995 and 2001. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;117(1):30-32.

Author(s) :

Horowitz ER, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Kaplan B.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleUR…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Objective: To compare the attitude of gravid women towards analgesia during labor in 1995 and 2001, in Israel.

Method: Women in the third trimester of pregnancy were asked to complete an antepartum questionnaire regarding the mode of analgesia they preferred during their labor. The questionnaire was distributed twice, once in 1995 and again in 2001, in order to study changing attitudes.

Results: Study participants included 114 women in 1995 and 125 in 2001. There were no differences between the groups in maternal age, gestational age, gravity, parity, or level of education. In 1995, 57% of the women were interested in having epidural analgesia during labor, compared to 66% in 2001 (P<0.001). The preference for opioids decreased from 31.5% in 1995 to 18.5% in 2001 (P<0.001). In 1995, none of the women questioned opted for avoiding all kinds of analgesia, whereas in 2001, 8% did so.

Conclusion: Women’s attitudes to analgesia during labor have changed over the last 6 years. Epidural block has become very popular, while opioids use lost its popularity; at the same time, there has been an increase in the number of women who prefer to avoid all kinds of analgesia during labor.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

La méthodologie et les résultats ne supportent pas les conclusions. Une différence
de moins de 10% sur un échantillon de à peine plus de 100 femmes n’est absolument
pas significatif. Les bras m’en tombent …

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ pain medication ; epidural ; maternal age ; pain

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 16 Nov 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth