Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=326 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Intrathecal sufentanil (5 vs. 10 microg) for labor analgesia: efficacy and side effects. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 May-Jun;23(3):252-7. |
Author(s) : | Norris MC, Fogel ST, Holtmann B. |
Year of publication : | 1998 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite growing popularity, there are few studies examining the relative efficacy of different doses of intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and side effects of 5 and 10 microg intrathecal sufentanil. METHODS: Sixty-three healthy, laboring, term parturients < or =5 cm cervical dilation participated in this study. In a randomized, double-blind fashion, patients received 5 or 10 microg intrathecal sufentanil as part of a combined spinal epidural technique. Patients rated pain, itching, nausea, and sedation on verbal analog scales before and every 10 minutes after drug injection. We also recorded maternal blood pressure and peripheral oxygen saturation before and every 10 minutes after drug injection. Before and 30 and 60 minutes after drug injection, we measured maternal end-tidal CO2. RESULTS: Both doses of sufentanil provided adequate analgesia. Although 10 microg sufentanil produced slightly more profound analgesia, the duration of pain relief did not differ between the two groups. Both drug doses were associated with significant increases in itching and end-tidal CO2. The 10-microg dose was associated with more sedation and a greater decrease in SaO2. CONCLUSIONS: Both 5 and 10 microg intrathecal sufentanil provided adequate labor analgesia. Both doses were associated with measurable spinal (itching) and supraspinal (sedation, respiratory depression) side effects. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; pain medication ; epidural ; pain ; dilation |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 07 Jan 2004 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |