Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=1107 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | The rational management of labor. Am Fam Physician. 1993 May 1;47(6):1471-81. |
Author(s) : | Smith MA, Ruffin MT 4th, Green LA. |
Year of publication : | 1993 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Some practices and procedures that are common during the management of childbirth lack proof of efficacy, and some have adverse effects. The practice of withholding food and liquids and using intravenous fluids during labor may pose risks such as fluid overload, and maternal and fetal hyperglycemia. Enemas should be reserved for women with painful constipation. Evidence does not support the value of shaving the perineal area. Nonpharmacologic measures to control pain during labor are safe and moderately effective. Pharmacologic methods of analgesia and anesthesia provide good pain relief but pose significant risks. Continuous electronic fetal monitoring should be considered a diagnostic procedure, not a screening procedure. Amniotomy may shorten labor but can result in abnormally high uterine forces, infection, umbilical cord prolapse and fetal laceration. Position changes and alternative birth positions promote greater comfort and efficiency during labor. Finally, episiotomy has not been shown to reduce severe lacerations or prevent pelvic relaxation, and use of this procedure should be limited. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | Une revue des mauvaise pratiques. Les changements de position et les positions non-conventionnelles augmentent le confort et l’efficacité du travail. La pratique de l’épisiotomie n’a pas réduit l’incidence des déchirures profondes. |
Argument (English): | Position changes and alternative birth positions promote greater comfort and efficiency during labor. |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; position during labor ; physiology ; duration of labour ; ethics ; deontology ; informed consent ; episiotomy ; active management of labor ; pain medication ; IV ; epidural ; rupture of membranes ; amniotomy ; pain ; monitoring |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 31 Mar 2005 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |