Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1202

Created on : 27 Apr 2005
Modified on : 08 May 2014

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Maternal upright posture and mobility in labor--a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 May;67(5):727-34.

Author(s) :

Lupe PJ, Gross TL.

Year of publication :

1986

URL(s) :

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

There has been a relatively recent interest in alternative birthing techniques, including increased maternal mobility during labor. This literature review was pursued to evaluate the effect of upright maternal posture and ambulation on the first stage of labor. Although previous reviews frequently assume that maternal ambulation speeds labor progress, the data presented in this review are not conclusive as to whether the upright maternal posture or ambulation during the first stage of labor shortens labor length or improves fetal outcome. However, it is clear that ambulation in labor is not harmful either to the mother or fetus. In addition, many investigators have reported that mobility in labor results in greater maternal comfort and ability to tolerate labor and decreased use of anesthesia and analgesia. Thus, acceptance of mobility in labor by patients and staff is generally reported. This information can serve as a guide to clinical management. However, there is a need for further analysis of the effect of maternal ambulation during labor, and specific suggestions for research are presented.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Revue. Bien que les données examinées ne prouvent pas que la déambulation accélère le travail ou améliore l’état du bébé, il est néanmoins clair qu’elle n’est en rien dangereuse, et qu’elle améliore le confort de la femme en coucheset diminue la demande analgésique.

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; physiology ; position during labor ; pain

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 27 Apr 2005

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth