Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=552

Created on : 08 Mar 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Risk factors for rupture of the anal sphincter. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Dec;87(2):129-32.

Author(s) :

Buchhave P, Flatow L, Rydhstroem H, Thorbert G.

Year of publication :

1999

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleUR…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for rupture of the anal sphincter during vaginal delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 292 parturients with rupture of the anal sphincter in four neighbouring central hospitals in southern Sweden between 1988 and 1990 were identified retrospectively. For each case a control was selected, the sole matching criterion being that the control woman was the next to give birth vaginally in the same unit as the case. Only singleton deliveries were included. For comparison of risk factors among cases and controls, McNemar’s test was used for bivariate testing; multiple regression analysis was restricted to those variables found to be significant in the bivariate analysis. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence limits (CL).

RESULTS: In all, 292 of 22,653 deliveries (1.3%) had a rupture of the anal sphincter. Of a total of 14 independent variables explored, 8 were found to be significantly associated with rupture of the anal sphincter in the bivariate testing. In the following multivariate analysis, three variables remained significantly associated with rupture of the anal sphincter: birthweight > or = 4000 g (OR 2.6; CL 1.7, 3.9), primiparity (OR 2.2; CL 1.5, 3.3) and episiotomy (OR 1.7; CL 1.1, 2.6).

CONCLUSION: Episiotomy appears to be significantly associated with rupture of the anal sphincter. In contrast to primiparity and birthweight, the incidence of episiotomy during vaginal delivery may easily be reduced. However, only a prospective, controlled study will disclose the true negative or positive effects of episiotomy.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Il y a une forte corrélation entre la pratique de l’épisiotomie et la rupture du sphincter anal. (Suède)

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; perineal/vaginal tears ; episiotomy

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 08 Mar 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth