Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2918 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Stress urinary incontinence and counseling and practice of pelvic floor exercises postpartum in low-income Hispanic women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. n. 19 |
Author(s) : | Sangi-Haghpeykar H., Mozayeni P, Young A, Fine PM. |
Year of publication : | 2008 |
URL(s) : | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17701092 |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | The purpose of the study was to provide estimates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and practice of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) postpartum as well as counseling during and after pregnancy among Hispanic women. Two hundred Hispanic women were surveyed 6 months postpartum. Twenty-three percent had SUI with onset primarily during pregnancy (70%). Only 20% had received information regarding SUI and PFMT during pregnancy or postpartum. Most women not counseled wished they were (81%). Less counseling occurred among Hispanic women with lower levels of education (odds ratio [OR]= .39; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.19-0.82; p=0.02) and those whose primary language was Spanish (OR= .36; 95% CI=0.15-0.87; p=0.02), while higher rates occurred among women with a forceps delivery (OR=2.94; 95% CI=1.06-7.78; p=0.03). Fifty-seven percent of women counseled practiced the exercises. Primary reasons for noncompliance were belief that PFMT would not help (47%), and not understanding the instructions (39%). SUI and PFMT counseling is low among Hispanic women. Most women desire such information, and improvement in performance of PFMT among this group is possible. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | étude de l’incontinence urinaire au test d“effort et de la reeducation du plancher pelvien en post partum dans une population espagnole. faible taux d’information (20%) comparé à un besoin important exprimé (80% des femmes n’en ayant pas bénéficié). les femmes les plus informées sont celles ayant eu des forceps. |
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ instrumental delivery ; forceps delivery ; incontinence/prolapsus |
Author of this record : | Alison Passieux — 06 Mar 2018 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |