Base de données - (CIANE)

Présentation de cette base de données documentaires (site du CIANE)
Actuellement 3111 fiches
➡ Chaîne YouTube (tutoriel)

https://ciane.net/id=2859

Créée le : 04 Jan 2018
Modifiée le : 30 Dec 2018

➡ Modifier cette fiche
Ne suivez ce lien que si vous possédez un mot de passe d’éditeur !

Notice bibliographique (sans auteurs) :

Interrupted versus continuous sutures for repair of episiotomy or 2nd degree perineal tears - Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC - Vol. 27, 3, p.680-683

Auteur·e(s) :

Rakhshanda Aslm, Shazia Amir Khan, Zain ul amir, Fouzia Amir Amir Khan

Année de publication :

2015

URL(s) :

http://jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

BACKGROUND: Performing an episiotomy is generally reserved for complicated childbirths, in cases of foetal distress, or when tearing of tissues with serious consequences are foreseen. In addition to the extent of the trauma, the surgical skill, repair after childbirth can have an important effect on the magnitude and degree of morbidity experienced by women after repair. The best technique for this repair would be that which produces less pain in the short and long term. The study was done with an objective to compare the frequency and severity of pain (slight/severe) by using interrupted and continuous methods for repair of episiotomy or second degree perineal tears.

METHODS: It is a randomized control trial. This study was carried out in a Gynaecology and Obstetrics department of Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi which is a tertiary care hospital. The duration of study was six months. One hundred & thirty-eight primigravidas (69 in each group) were included in the study.

RESULTS: Majority of the patients in both groups belonged to 20-25 years age group, i.e., 48.53% (n=33) in group-A and 50% (n=34) in group-B, mean and SD, was 27.69±3.21 in group-A and 28.16±3.89 in group-B, gestation age of the patients in group-A 77.94% (n=53) and 83.82% (n=57) in group-B between 37-40 weeks of gestation. Complication of pain and its severity in both groups at 24 hours and 10th day were compared which showed no significant difference at any severity (i.e., no pain, mild moderate/severe).

CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in frequency and severity of pain (slight/severe) in using interrupted and continuous methods for repair of second degree perineal tears or episiotomy.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Texte intégral (public) :

Remarques :

Argument (français) :

Il n’y a pas de différence significative dans la fréquence et l’intensité de la douleur (légère/sévère) dans l’utilisation de méthodes interrompues et continues pour la réparation de déchirures périnéales au deuxième degré ou d’épisiotomie.

Argument (English):

There is no significant difference in frequency and severity of pain (slight/severe) in using interrupted and continuous methods for repair of second degree perineal tears or episiotomy

Argumento (português):

Não há diferença significativa na frequência e gravidade da dor (leve/grave) no uso de métodos interrompidos e contínuos para o reparo de lesões perineais de segundo grau ou episiotomia

Argumento (español):

Mots-clés :

➡ épisiotomie

Auteur·e de cette fiche :

Import 04/01/2018 — 04 Jan 2018
➡ dernière modification : Bernard Bel — 30 Dec 2018