Banco de dados - (CIANE)

Descrição deste banco de dados documental (Site da CIANE)
Atualmente 3111 fichas
➡ Canal do YouTube (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2552

Criado em : 02 Aug 2014
Alterado em : 02 Aug 2014

➡ Modificar esta ficha
Siga este link somente se você tiver um palavra chave de editor!

Nota bibliográfica (sem autor) :

Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology - Vol. 115, 2 - ISBN: 1471-0528 - p.247-252

Autores :

Fritel, X; Schaal, Jp; Fauconnier, A; Bertrand, V; Levet, C; Pigné, A

Ano de publicação :

2008

URL(s) :

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-…
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01540.x

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Objective  To compare two policies for episiotomy: restrictive and systematic. Design  Quasi-randomised comparative study. Setting  Two French university hospitals with contrasting policies for episiotomy: one using episiotomy restrictively and the second routinely. Population  Seven hundred and seventy-four nulliparous women delivered during 1996 of a singleton in cephalic presentation at a term of 37–41 weeks. Methods  A questionnaire was mailed 4 years after delivery. Sample size was calculated to allow us to show a 10% difference in the prevalence of urinary incontinence with 80% power. Main outcome measures  Urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, perineal pain, and pain during intercourse. Results  We received 627 responses (81%), 320 from women delivered under the restrictive policy, 307 from women delivered under the routine policy. In the restrictive group, 186 (49%) deliveries included mediolateral episiotomies and in the routine group, 348 (88%). Four years after the first delivery, there was no difference in the prevalence of urinary incontinence (26 versus 32%), perineal pain (6 versus 8%), or pain during intercourse (18 versus 21%) between the two groups. Anal incontinence was less prevalent in the restrictive group (11 versus 16%). The difference was significant for flatus (8 versus 13%) but not for faecal incontinence (3% for both groups). Logistic regression confirmed that a policy of routine episiotomy was associated with a risk of anal incontinence nearly twice as high as the risk associated with a restrictive policy (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.05–3.22). Conclusions  A policy of routine episiotomy does not protect against urinary or anal incontinence 4 years after first delivery.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comentários :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Palavras-chaves :

➡ episiotomia

Autor da esta ficha :

Import 02/08/2014 — 02 Aug 2014