Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1726

Created on : 01 Feb 2006
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

➡ Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Failed VBAC: how risky is it? I. Maternal Morbidity. AJOG, 184, p.1365

Author(s) :

Hibbard

Year of publication :

2001

URL(s) :

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Retro, chart review, 29,255 deliveries, 2450 had previous CS. 1344 patients who were appropriate attempted VBAC or 75% of all appropriate candidates. There was a 69% success (921 with 424 unsuccessful) The overall rate of uterine rupture was 1.1% of all women attempting VBAC, the rate of true disruption was 0.8% and the rate of hysterectomy was 0.5%. Blood loss was less but chorioamnionitis was higher in the women attempting VBAC. Compared with patients who were successful in attempts at VBAC, those who ended up with CS had a uterine rupture rate of 8.9%.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Fiche importée de http://www.worldserver.com/turk/birthing/rrvbac2000-4.html avec l’aide de Ken Turkowski, septembre 2005

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ vaginal birth after caesarean ; c-section/caesarean

Author of this record :

Ken Turkowski — 01 Feb 2006