Choose your font:
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Source Sans Pro


[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3109 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

Created on : 10 Mar 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000166.

Author(s) :

Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME.

Year of publication :


URL(s) :…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

BACKGROUND: Routine use of caesarean section for breech presentation is widespread. However, poor outcomes after breech birth might be the result of underlying conditions causing breech presentation rather than damage during delivery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of planned caesarean section for singleton breech presentation at term on measures of pregnancy outcome.

SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (November 2002) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing planned caesarean section for singleton breech presentation at term with planned vaginal birth.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed trial eligibility and quality.

MAIN RESULTS: Three trials (2396 participants) were included in the review.Caesarean delivery occurred in 550/1227 (45%) of those women allocated to a vaginal delivery protocol. Perinatal or neonatal death (excluding fatal anomalies) or serious neonatal morbidity was reduced (relative risk (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.56) with planned caesarean section. The reduction in risk of perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity was less for countries with high national perinatal mortality rates. Perinatal or neonatal death (excluding fatal anomalies) was also reduced (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.86) with planned caesarean section. The proportional reductions were similar for countries with low and high national perinatal mortality rates. Planned caesarean section was associated with modestly increased short-term maternal morbidity (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.61). At 3 months after delivery, women allocated to the planned caesarean section group reported less urinary incontinence (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.93); more abdominal pain (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.29 to 2. 79); and less perineal pain (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.58).

REVIEWER’S CONCLUSIONS: Planned caesarean section compared with planned vaginal birth reduced perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity for the singleton breech baby at term, at the expense of somewhat increased maternal morbidity. Information on long-term consequences of caesarean section, such as reproductive function and emotional adjustment, is limited. The option of external cephalic version is dealt with in separate reviews. The data from this review cannot be generalised to settings where women labour and birth at home, or where caesarean section is not readily available, or to methods of breech delivery that differ materially from the clinical delivery protocols used in the trials reviewed. The review will help to inform individualised decision-making regarding breech delivery.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Cette étude a été réfutée en 2006 par un des auteurs (Glezerman), voir fiche 1939

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; dystocy ; breech presentation ; morbidity ; perinatal death rates

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 10 Mar 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
➡ Only identified users

 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice


New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact


This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE,
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase) for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth