Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=474 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Editor’s choice. Abusing patients by denying them choice. The British Medical Journal, 328 (14 February) |
Author(s) : | Smith R. |
Year of publication : | 2004 |
URL(s) : | http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/74… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | A useful tip for smart are medical students. If asked: “What is the treatment for x?”Don’t answer: “y.” Instead answer: “Whatever the patient chooses together with me after being fully informed of the pluses and minuses of all options.” Giving patients choice incomplex circumstances emerges as a theme in this issue—with the sombre overtone that not to give patients choice is to abuse them. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Full text (public) : | |
Comments : | Editorial de 2004 dans BMJ. Concerne la santé en général, sur l’exemple du dépistage du cancer colorectal. L’auteur affirme que de ne pas permettre au patient de choisir est une forme de maltraitance (“denying patient choice is a form of abuse“). Le contre argument comme quoi l’information des patients est “trop difficile, coûteuse et prend du temps“ n’est ni fondé sur des preuves, ni recevable politiquement |
Argument (français) : | Les principaux arguments contre l’information complète des patients sont les suivants: «C’est trop difficile, coûteux et prend beaucoup de temps». Mais ils ne sont ni fondés sur des preuves ni politiquement viables. |
Argument (English): | The main arguments against fully informing patients are that “It’s too difficult, costly, and time consuming.” But they are neither evidence based nor politically sustainable. |
Argumento (português): | Os principais argumentos contra a informação completa dos pacientes são: “É muito difícil, dispendioso e demorado“. Mas eles não são baseados em evidências nem politicamente sustentáveis. |
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ midwifery training ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; obstetric and gynecologic violence obstetric violence, obstetrical violence ; midwife ; deontology ; informed consent |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 13 Feb 2004 |
Related records | |
---|---|
Pinned by #3059 | Marie-Laure Franeczek (2018). Violence obstétricale : essai de définition à partir de la littérature scientifique. Mémoire de gynécologie et obstétrique. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=3059 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |