Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1254

Created on : 23 May 2005
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2005;271(4):307-310.

Author(s) :

Sheiner E, Levy A, Walfisch A, Hallak M, Mazor M.

Year of publication :

2005

URL(s) :

http://springerlink.metapress.com/media/3846WJMQWQ…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: Midline episiotomy is a known major risk factor for severe perineal lacerations. The study was aimed to define obstetric risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.

STUDY DESIGN: A comparison between vaginal deliveries complicated with third-degree perineal tears and deliveries without third-degree perineal tears was performed. Deliveries occurred between the years 1988–1999 in a tertiary medical center. Multiple gestations, preterm deliveries (<37 weeks gestation), cesarean deliveries and cases of shoulder dystocia were excluded from the analysis. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in order to find independent risk factors for third-degree perineal tears. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the regression coefficient.

RESULTS: During the study period, 79 (0.1%) consecutive cases of third degree perineal tears were identified. Significant risk factors from the univariate analysis were fetal macrosomia (OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.2–5.5), nulliparity (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.8–4.6), labor induction (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.0–3.5), failure of labor to progress during the second stage (OR 10.8, 95%CI 5.4–21.1), non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns (OR 11.7, 95%CI 6.1–21.5), mediolateral episiotomy (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.8–4.5), vacuum extraction (OR 10.6, 95%CI 6.1–18.3), and forceps delivery (OR 29.2, 95%CI 7.3–97.2). However, using a multivariable analysis, only fetal macrosomia (OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.2–4.9), vacuum extraction (OR 8.2, 95%CI 4.7–14.5), and forceps delivery (OR 26.7, 95%CI 8.0–88.5) remained as independent risk factors. The combined risk for instrumental deliveries of macrosomic newborns was 8.6 (95% CI 1.2–62.5; p=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for possible confounding variables, mediolateral episiotomy per se was not an independent risk factor for third-degree perineal tears. Instrumental vaginal deliveries of macrosomic fetuses should be avoided whenever possible to decrease the occurrence of third-degree perineal tears.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Full text (private) :

 ➡ Access requires authorization

Comments :

Texte en accès libre. Ce n’est pas un article original, le même contenu avait déjà été publié dans un autre journal. Le taux particulièrement bas de déchirures sévères, 0.1%, soit 79 cas en 11 ans, jette quelque suspicion sur leurs résultats statistiques, ce qui est bien dommage. Les auteurs en conviennent eux-mêmes dans la discussion d’ailleurs.

Argument (français) :

Les facteurs de risque indépendants de déchirures sévères du périnée sont les extractions instrumentales et la macrosomie.

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; perineal/vaginal tears ; episiotomy ; instrumental delivery ; forceps delivery ; vacuum extraction (ventouse) ; induction of labor ; post-term pregnancy

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 23 May 2005

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth