Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=866 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | A priori risk and optimal test accuracy in prenatal diagnostics. Med Decis Making. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):406-13. |
Author(s) : | Felder S, Werblow A, Robra BP. |
Year of publication : | 2003 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | The prevalence of fetal chromosome anomalies rises exponentially with the age of the pregnant woman. The risk of fetal anomalies can be specified using biochemical screening tests such as the triple test. This test substantially reduces the number of amniocenteses and proportionally the number of procedure-related miscarriages. However, disadvantages of the triple test include the utility loss of pregnant women who, following a false-negative test result, do not undergo amniocentesis and bear a disabled child as well as the intangible cost of a false-positive triple test. This paper employs a decision-analytic model to reveal the evaluation of this tradeoff, which is implicitly fixed by policy recommendations for a direct amniocentesis at maternal age of 35. It then determines the optimal level of cutoff risk for the triple test, and derives comparative static results: the optimal test accuracy decreases with increasing a-priori risk and increases with a rise in the miscarriage risk and in the woman’s preference for detecting an affected fetus as compared to avoiding a miscarriage of an unaffected fetus. These results are in contrast to current clinical practice, where the cutoff of the triple test usually remains fixed. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | Un modèle de prise de décision optimale pour mettre en balance les risques et bénéfices des tests biochimiques de dépistage d’anomalies chromosomiques |
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; amniocentesis ; screening ; miscarriage ; maternal age ; trisomy |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 27 Jul 2004 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |