Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=827 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | How do obstetric variables influence the dimensions of the birth experience as assessed by Salmon’s item list (SIL-Ger)? European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;115(1):43-50. |
Author(s) : | Stadlmayr W, Schneider H, Amsler F, Bürgin D, Bitzer J. |
Year of publication : | 2004 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Objective: To analyse the effect of obstetric variables on four dimensions of the birth experience. Design/participants: The birth experience of 251 German-speaking women was assessed at 48–96 h postpartum by means of Salmon’s item list – German-language version (SIL-Ger). Method/main outcome measures: Statistical correlations and variances between four dimensions of the birth experience (fulfilment, emotional adaptation, negative emotional experience, physical discomfort) and common obstetric variables were calculated. The explained variance is assessed by a stepwise regression analysis. Results: In general the variance explained by the investigated obstetric variables per se is low. The mode of delivery affects the dimension of negative emotional experience with a constant qualitative worsening in the order of spontaneous deliveries, instrumental deliveries, elective and unplanned caesarean sections. Epidurals are associated neither with positive nor with negative evaluative feelings. To assess the impact of duration, the subjective latent phase of labour has to be taken into consideration in addition to the duration of labour itself. Not only very long durations of labour, but also very short ones may induce negative evaluative feelings in the immediate postpartum. Conclusions: Further research on this question must include the aspect of the parturients’ subjective perception of both obstetric procedures and the attending staff. Clinicians should be aware that epidurals and elective caesarean sections do not necessarily enhance positive evaluative feelings in the immediate postpartum. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Full text (private) : | |
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 30 Jun 2004 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |