Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=771 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;190(5):1198-1200. |
Author(s) : | Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. |
Year of publication : | 2004 |
URL(s) : | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/… |
Résumé (français) : | En réponse à la crise de la responsabilité professionnelle, l’intérêt personnel peut devenir dominant et détourner le professionnalisme de la fiducie (mise sous tutelle, curatelle) de sa place centrale dans la vie morale des médecins et des chefs de médecins. Nous fournissons des outils d’éthique préventive pour traiter cette dimension éthique négligée de la crise de la responsabilité professionnelle. Nous développons ces outils sur la base du concept de médecin en tant que fiduciaire du patient, qui a été introduit dans la littérature anglophone sur l’éthique médicale par le Dr John Gregory (1714-1773). Ces outils sont conçus pour préserver et renforcer 4 vertus professionnelles : intégrité, compassion, effacement de soi et sacrifice de soi. Les réponses acceptables et inacceptables à la crise de responsabilité professionnelle sont identifiées par l’utilisation de ces 4 vertus. Ces vertus devraient être soutenues par une culture organisationnelle de professionnalisme fiduciaire. Les médecins et les dirigeants de médecins devraient utiliser une culture organisationnelle façonnée par ces 4 vertus professionnelles pour créer des modèles de meilleures pratiques éthiques. |
Abstract (English) : | In response to the professional liability crisis, self-interest can become dominant and displace fiduciary professionalism from its central place in the moral lives of physicians and physician leaders. We provide preventive ethics tools to address this neglected ethical dimension of the professional liability crisis. We develop these tools on the basis of the concept of the physician as fiduciary of the patient, which was introduced in the English-language literature of medical ethics by Dr John Gregory (1714-1773). These tools are designed to preserve and strengthen 4 professional virtues: integrity, compassion, self-effacement, and self-sacrifice. Acceptable and unacceptable responses to the professional liability crisis are identified with the use of these 4 virtues. These virtues should be supported by an organizational culture of fiduciary professionalism. An organizational culture that is shaped by these 4 professional virtues should be used by physicians and physician leaders to create ethical best-practice models. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | En réponse à la crise de la responsabilité professionnelle, l’intérêt personnel peut devenir dominant et détourner le professionnalisme de la fiducie (mise sous tutelle, curatelle) de sa place centrale dans la vie morale des médecins et des chefs de médecins. Nous fournissons des outils d’éthique préventive pour traiter cette dimension éthique négligée de la crise de la responsabilité professionnelle. |
Argument (English): | In response to the professional liability crisis, self-interest can become dominant and displace fiduciary professionalism from its central place in the moral lives of physicians and physician leaders. We provide preventive ethics tools to address this neglected ethical dimension of the professional liability crisis. |
Argumento (português): | Em resposta à crise de responsabilidade profissional, o interesse próprio pode tornar-se dominante e desviar o profissionalismo da confiança (colocação sob tutela, curadoria) de seu lugar central na vida moral dos médicos e dos chefes dos médicos. Fornecemos ferramentas de ética preventiva para abordar essa dimensão ética negligenciada da crise de responsabilidade profissional. |
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ ethics ; history, sociology ; deontology ; informed consent |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 28 May 2004 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |