Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=749

Created on : 30 Apr 2004
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Women’s experiences with low-risk singleton in-hospital delivery in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 Feb 21;134(7-8):103-9.

Author(s) :

Schwappach DL, Blaudszun A, Conen D, Eichler K, Hochreutener MA, Koeck CM.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal and neonatal clinical short-term outcomes and women’s experiences with singleton low-risk in-hospital deliveries in a routine care setting.

METHODS: In 13 community hospitals in the Cantons of Zurich (10), St. Gallen (2) and Schwyz (1), participating in the "Canton of Zurich Outcomes Project", trained hospital staff recorded clinical outcome data. Patients completed a questionnaire at the end of the hospital stay. Over two measurement cycles, 3395 eligible women entered the study and 2079 (61%) returned the questionnaire.

RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of women had spontaneous and 11% had assisted vaginal deliveries, 12% delivered by emergency, and 10% by elective Caesarean section. The episiotomy rate in vaginal deliveries was 46% (95% CI 44-48%). Ten percent of neonates had umbilical cord artery pH < or =7.15 (95% CI 9-11%) and Apgar scores at five minutes were < or = 7 in 3% (95% CI 2.5-3.6%). Reporting negative experiences with hospital care and an insufficient state of knowledge at discharge were strongly associated with mode of delivery. The top three issues new mothers were most likely to report about feeling little or not informed about were postpartum pelvic floor exercises (22%), management of vaginal bleedings (12%), and alternatives of infant feeding (10%).

CONCLUSION: In a setting of routine care poor short-term outcomes were rare in women giving birth in hospitals, and neonates and most mothers were discharged with a level of information that at least ensured a smooth transition to follow-up maternal care. Poor clinical results and patient-reported negative experiences concentrate in few individuals. Restrictive approaches that reduce the frequency of instrumental vaginal delivery, and routine episiotomy remain an important objective for quality improvement.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Un objectif important pour l’amélioration de la qualité des services sera l’usage restreint de l’extraction instrumentale et de l’épisiotomie. (Canton de Zurich)

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; episiotomy ; instrumental delivery

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 30 Apr 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth