Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=638

Created on : 13 Apr 2004
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

➡ Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

The decision to delivery interval in emergency and non-urgent cesarean sections. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;113(2):182-185.

Author(s) :

Lurie S, Sulema V, Kohen-Sacher B, Sadan O, Glezerman M.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T69…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the decision to delivery interval (DDI) in our obstetric unit in comparison to current recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of all non-elective cesarean sections during a 10 months period in a delivery ward of a university tertiary health care facility was performed. The DDI was compared between emergency and non-urgent cesarean sections.

RESULTS: The DDI was 25.8±10.8 and 46.2±19.9 min in the emergency and non-urgent cesareans, respectively (P<0.01). In the emergency group, 71% delivered within 30 min compared to 35% in the non-urgent group (P<0.05) and in the emergent-crash group 100% delivered within 30 min compared to 59% in the emergent-non-crash group (P<0.05). No correlation was found between the DDI and umbilical artery pH or Apgar score at 1 or 5 min in infants of each cesarean group.

CONCLUSION: The proposed 30 min DDI standard was achieved in 100, 71, 47 and 35% of emergent-crash, emergent, emergent-non-crash and non-urgent cesareans sections, respectively.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 13 Apr 2004