[Advantages and risk of a trial of vaginal delivery in the scarred uterus] Tunis Med. 2003 Aug;81(8):563-6.

Choose your font:
✓ Arimo
➡ Merriweather
➡ Mukta Malar
➡ Open Sans Condensed
➡ Rokkitt
➡ Source Sans Pro

✓ English
➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español

	Database - (CIANE)
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) Currently 3111 records ➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=596 Created on : 10 Mar 2004 Modified on : 02 Dec 2007	➡ Modify this record Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password! Share: Hard
Bibliographical entry (without author) :	[Advantages and risk of a trial of vaginal delivery in the scarred uterus] Tunis Med. 2003 Aug;81(8):563-6.
Author(s) :	Ben AN, Sadfi A, Gara F.
Year of publication :	2003
URL(s) :	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…
Résumé (français) :
Abstract (English) :	We present a retrospective study of 1235 deliveries in scarred uterus. The aim of this study is to analyse the materno-fetal mortality and morbidity after caesarean section and a trial vaginal delivery. Uterine challenge has been tried is 578 cases with success in 12.14%. The global rate of real uterine rupture is 1.3% and of scare opening is 3.16%. The trial vaginal birth was complicated by uterine rupture in 5.9% versus 2.89% in planned caesarean section. (P = 0.00967). The length of hospitalization, the number of blood transfusion and the rate of puerperal infections are lower in the vaginal delivery trial group. The rate of new-born with Apgar < 7 in the 5th minute is in a significative way, lower in the iterative caesarean section group. (2.58% versus 4.67%), (P = 0.048). In the other hand, uterine rupture rate as well as fetal distress rate are higher in case of failure of the vaginal delivery. Maternal and fetal complications are rare and seem to be more frequent in case of failure of the uterine challenge. Accurate analysis of different obstetrical situations is necessary in order to predict the success or the failure of the vaginal delivery trial. It may lessen the maternal and fetal morbidity.
Sumário (português) :
Resumen (español) :
Comments :
Argument (français) :
Argument (English):
Argumento (português):
Argumento (español):
Keywords :	➡ c-section/caesarean ; morbidity
Author of this record :	Cécile Loup — 10 Mar 2004

	Discussion (display only in English)

➡ Only identified users Click “login” on the top right to sign in or create your account I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth