➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español
![[Valid RSS]](images/icons/valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=icon}
 | Database - (CIANE) |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) | |
|
https://ciane.net/id=507 | ➡ Modify this record   Hard |
|
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;186(2):274-8. |
|
Author(s) : | Bai J, Wong FW, Bauman A, Mohsin M. |
|
Year of publication : | 2002 |
|
URL(s) : | |
|
Résumé (français) : |
|
|
Abstract (English) : | OBJECTIVE: The issue of parity and risk of pregnancy outcomes has been controversial for many decades. We conducted a study to evaluate the association between parity and pregnancy outcomes and to clarify the basis of the classification of risk based on parity. STUDY DESIGN: The study is a cross-sectional analysis on a large routinely collected data set of singleton births from 1992 to 1997 in New South Wales, Australia. Pregnancy outcomes were compared among parity groups. RESULTS: There was a significant association between different parity levels and pregnancy outcomes in terms of obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and perinatal mortality, after adjustment for potential confounders, including age, maternal smoking status, and socioeconomic status. In terms of obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and perinatal mortality, subjects can be classified into 3 groups according to parity: nulliparity, low multiparity (parity 1, 2, and 3), and grand multipara (parity 4 to 8). Compared with low multiparity, mothers and babies of nulliparity and grand multipara are at higher risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study supported the definition of grand multiparity that should start from parity 4 or the 5th baby. Attention should be paid to subjects of nulliparity and grand multiparity for their different problems. |
|
Sumário (português) : |
|
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
|
Comments : | |
|
Argument (français) : |
|
|
Argument (English): | |
|
Argumento (português): |
|
|
Argumento (español): |
|
|
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; perinatal death rates ; morbidity ; maternal age |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 23 Feb 2004 |
| Discussion (display only in English) | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice | ||
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
| Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |