Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=498 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Physicians’ role and gender differences in the management of parents of a stillborn child: a nationwide study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;21(1). |
Author(s) : | Säflund K, Sjögren B, Wredling R. |
Year of publication : | 2000 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | During spring 1997 all gynecologists working at gynecology departments in Sweden were sent a questionnaire regarding their role in, and attitudes to, the management of the parents of a stillborn child. Of 871 gynecologists approached, 761 answered the questionnaire (87%). The majority considered that the parents should hold the child (94%), that the child should be given a name (80%) and that the child should be photographed (92%). A smaller proportion considered that labor should be started within 24 h (40%) and that siblings should see the child (55%). A minority experienced guilt at what had happened (12%) and one-third were anxious about possible disciplinary measures (30%). The majority of the gynecologists stated that the need for guidance was urgent (90%) but that only a minority had received this (40%). Regarding gender differences, it emerged that the female gynecologists did not consider there was an age limit for siblings to see the child (p = 0.003), were less inclined to prescribe tranquilizers (p = 0.001) or to prolong the parents’ sick-listing (p = 0.020). These differences remained after regression analysis was performed using background variables as covariates. In summary, this study demonstrates a great need for guidance; but that only a minority of the gynecologists get this. The lack of guidance/training may in the future increase the risk of this professional group becoming ’burnt out’. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ physiology ; ethics ; induction of labor ; deontology ; informed consent ; stillbirth ; post-term pregnancy |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 17 Feb 2004 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |