Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=481 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Obstetric difficulties in developing countries motivate preference for birth size. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;23(2). |
Author(s) : | Tayie FAK, Lartey A. |
Year of publication : | 2002 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | The aim of this study was to assess the influence of labor difficulties on mothers’ preference for birth size. A total of 502 pregnant Ghanaian women were interviewed to ascertain what size of infant they wished to deliver. Information on reasons, measures taken to achieve preferred birth size and birth weight of infants delivered by them was obtained. Results showed that even though mothers had particular preferences for birth size, actual birth weight of infants delivered did not tally with mothers’ preference. More women with previous childbirth experience wanted small infants than those who had no experience. Overall 41% of the mothers preferred small or medium size infants for easy labor. Large infants on delivery were preferred by 11% of the mothers because they claimed large infants are tough. Approximately 48% of mothers had no particular preference for birth size. It seemed mothers wanting small infants had previous labor problems due to large birth size. A substantial number (40%) of the mothers did not take measures to achieve the preferred birth size. About 4% reported to have reduced their dietary intake to less than the non-pregnancy intake to deliver small infants. About 7% of the women who preferred large infants at birth claimed they ate more food to achieve their aim. Mothers who had mechanical difficulties during labor delivered infants of significantly higher birth weight than those who delivered normally without extra assistance (p < 0.002). Women who experienced a difficult childbirth believed that high infant birth weight could pose labor problems. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | Bon, je sais pas ou le mettre celui-la … |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 17 Feb 2004 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |