Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=449

Created on : 10 Feb 2004
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Get Autopsy After Abortion for Fetal Anomaly. Ob.Gyn News 2004;39(2):12.

Author(s) :

Mahoney D.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www2.eobgynnews.com/scripts/om.dll/serve?ac…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Postabortion autopsies can provide important risk-recurrence information to parents when pregnancy is terminated because of a prenatal diagnosis of a fetal anomaly, according to a 10-year retrospective study, said Dr. Patricia A. Boyd of the Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, England, and her associates.

Based on information gathered from the Oxford Congenital Anomaly Register and the Oxford Maternity Data System, there were 309 terminations after fetal anomaly diagnosis in 57,258 deliveries from 1991 through 2000. Of the terminations, autopsies were conducted in 132 cases in which the anomalies were identified by ultrasound with no evidence for abnormal karyotype (BMJ [online], 2003; http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/bmj.37939.570104.EEv1).

In 35 of the 132 cases, the autopsy added information that led to a reduction in risk-recurrence estimates in 17 cases and an increase in 18 cases. In 11 of these 18 cases, the risk of recurrence estimate rose to a one in four chance, the investigators said.

In 95 of the cases in which autopsy was conducted, the autopsy confirmed the suspected prenatal diagnosis and did not add important further information. Two cases were not classified. The results provide important information for parents and health care providers. “If a termination has been carried out because of anomalies detected by ultrasound scan, by declining an autopsy, parents will remain ignorant of information that might change the recurrence risk in 1 in 4 cases and have a 1 in 13 chance for missing confirmation of a high [1 in 4] recurrence risk,” the investigators said.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ screening ; foetus growth

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 10 Feb 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth