Peridural anesthesia and method of delivery. Peridural anesthesia performed by the obstetrician. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1990 Sep-Oct;194(5):228-35.

Choose your font:
✓ Arimo
➡ Merriweather
➡ Mukta Malar
➡ Open Sans Condensed
➡ Rokkitt
➡ Source Sans Pro

✓ English
➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español

	Database - (CIANE)
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) Currently 3111 records ➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=352 Created on : 08 Jan 2004 Modified on : 02 Dec 2007	➡ Modify this record Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password! Share: Hard
Bibliographical entry (without author) :	Peridural anesthesia and method of delivery. Peridural anesthesia performed by the obstetrician. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1990 Sep-Oct;194(5):228-35.
Author(s) :	Walter HM.
Year of publication :	1990
URL(s) :	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…
Résumé (français) :
Abstract (English) :	In deliveries in epidural analgesia (PDA) there are more obstetrical operations than in deliveries without PDA. We have investigated the delivery mode in relation to the indication of epidural analgesia. If the PDA is done because of prolonged course of labour or because of suspicious fetal heart rate, about 40% of these women deliver spontaneously, in about 35% a cesarean is done, and in about 25% a forceps- or vacuum-extraction is done. This high rate of operative interventions is not unexpected due to the indication that led to epidural analgesia. If the PDA is done because of painful labour only, 60% of these mothers deliver spontaneously, 12% by cesarean and about 28% by forceps or vacuum. The rate of vaginal extractions is triple as in all obstetric patients of the clinic. The increase of operative deliveries in PDA isn’t found generally. Epidural analgesia managed by the obstetrician doesn’t result in more complications by the method itself, the increase of operative deliveries is found even in clinics where the PDA is carried out by the anesthetist. The possible reasons are discussed.
Sumário (português) :
Resumen (español) :
Comments :	Tres mauvais anglais, pas sure d’avoir vraiment compris ce qu’ils veulent dire.
Argument (français) :
Argument (English):
Argumento (português):
Argumento (español):
Keywords :	➡ c-section/caesarean ; fetal distress ; instrumental delivery ; epidural ; forceps delivery ; vacuum extraction (ventouse)
Author of this record :	Cécile Loup — 08 Jan 2004

	Discussion (display only in English)

➡ Only identified users Click “login” on the top right to sign in or create your account I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth