➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español
![[Valid RSS]](images/icons/valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=icon}
 | Database - (CIANE) |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) | |
|
https://ciane.net/id=337 | ➡ Modify this record   Hard |
|
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Fetal heart rate and neonatal condition related to epidural analgesia in women reaching the second stage of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Oct 8;41(3):173-8. |
|
Author(s) : | Spencer JA, Koutsoukis M, Lee A. |
|
Year of publication : | 1991 |
|
URL(s) : | |
|
Résumé (français) : |
|
|
Abstract (English) : | The relationship between epidural analgesia and a number of labour and delivery factors, relevant to fetal and neonatal condition, was considered in a prospective study of 200 labours reaching the second stage of labour. The group was representative of the hospital population with regard to the proportion of nulliparous women, the incidence of instrumental vaginal deliveries and the incidence of epidural analgesia (37%). The 8% of labours requiring fetal blood sampling during the first stage, and the labours with fetal heart rate (FHR) decelerations in the hour prior to second stage (25%) and during pushing (50%) were significantly more likely to have been given an epidural. Nulliparity (55%), induced labour (34%), a first stage longer than eight hours (37%), a second stage longer than 60 min (43%), maternal pushing for longer than 36 min (50%), forceps delivery (28%) and a 1 min Apgar score less than 7 (12%) were also factors associated with significantly higher rates of epidural analgesia whereas meconium (15%), a small baby (16%) and umbilical arterial metabolic acidaemia (13%) were not. FHR decelerations in labours reaching the second stage with an epidural reflect adjustments to fetal cardiovascular control and not acidaemia. |
|
Sumário (português) : |
|
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
|
Comments : | |
|
Argument (français) : |
|
|
Argument (English): | |
|
Argumento (português): |
|
|
Argumento (español): |
|
|
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; physiology ; induction of labor ; fetal distress ; instrumental delivery ; epidural ; forceps delivery ; post-term pregnancy |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 08 Jan 2004 |
| Discussion (display only in English) | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice | ||
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
| Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |