Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=3149

Created on : 03 Jan 2020
Modified on : 04 Jan 2020

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Is the incidence of recurrent pregnancy loss increasing? A retrospective register‐based study in Sweden. AOGS, 96, 11: 1365-1372

Author(s) :

Emma Rasmark Roepke, Leif Matthiesen, Rebecca Rylance, Ole Bjarne Christiansen

Year of publication :

2017

URL(s) :

https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.…
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13210

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Introduction

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The prevalence of RPL defined as three or more consecutive miscarriages before gestation week 22, is often stated to be 1%. To our knowledge no study has estimated the incidence of RPL, which might be more informative and clinically relevant than the prevalence.
Material and methods

This retrospective register‐based study was conducted from 2003 until 2012 in Sweden with data provided by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. In all, 6852 women were registered with the diagnoses of RPL in the National Patient Register. The incidence of RPL is the number of new women receiving the RPL diagnosis per year in the numerator and population at risk in the denominator.
Results

For each year, from 2003 to 2012, the incidence was calculated in two different risk populations: [1] all women aged 18–42 years, and [2] all women registered as being pregnant (deliveries or miscarriages). The average incidence in the study period was 53 per 100 000 (0.05%) in women aged 18–42 years and 650 per 100 000 (0.65%) in women who had achieved pregnancy in the period. The incidence of RPL in the two risk populations increased by 74 and 58%, respectively, during the study period.
Conclusion

This study suggests that the incidence of RPL increased during the 10‐year period studied. Causes can only be speculated upon in this study design, but might be associated with environmental changes, as the increase was fairly rapid.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Full text (public) :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

En Suède, l’incidence des pertes de grossesse récurrentes a augmenté de 58% au cours d’une période de 10 ans, 2003-2012.

Argument (English):

In Sweden, the incidence of recurrent pregnancy loss increased by 58% over a 10-year period, 2003-2012.

Argumento (português):

Na Suécia, a incidência de perda recorrente de gravidez aumentou 58% durante um período de 10 anos, 2003-2012.

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ survey ; miscarriage ; neonatal mortality

Author of this record :

Bernard Bel — 03 Jan 2020
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 04 Jan 2020

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth