Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=3136

Created on : 26 Nov 2019
Modified on : 27 Nov 2019

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 6, pages 1307-1318

Author(s) :

Christine McCourt

Year of publication :

2006

URL(s) :

https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/social-scien…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.031

Résumé (français)  :

Cette étude s’est concentrée sur les schémas de communication entre les sages-femmes et les femmes enceintes et leurs implications pour l’information, le choix et le contrôle, comme le préconise désormais la politique du gouvernement britannique. Une précédente évaluation de notes de cas d’une nouvelle organisation de soins de maternité dans laquelle les sages-femmes portaient une charge de travail personnelle n’indiquait aucune différence entre les normes de qualité en matière de soins des sages-femmes et les soins classiques, alors que les femmes utilisant ce service donnaient un point de vue différent. Afin de comprendre si cette différence pourrait être un artefact de la recherche, des réponses au changement, ou un reflet des limites de l’utilisation de notes de cas pour la recherche, une étude basée sur des observations a été menée.

Quarante entretiens ont été observés dans trois contextes britanniques : une clinique hospitalière, une clinique de médecine générale et des maisons pour femmes. Les entretiens ont été enregistrés sur bande et des notes et des dessins d’interaction ont été réalisés. Les transcriptions ont été analysées selon des approches structurées et qualitatives. Les modèles d’interaction différaient selon le modèle de soins, c’est-à-dire les cas classiques ou le nombre de cas, et le réglage des soins. Plusieurs « tâches » clés lors des visites ont été notées, le dépistage des risques et l’information en matière d’éducation pour la santé étant prédominants dans les soins classiques. Un continuum de styles de communication a été identifié, les styles prévalents étant également différents en fonction du lieu et de l’organisation des soins. Les styles hiérarchiques et formels évoqués dans les travaux sociologiques antérieurs étaient les plus courants dans les soins classiques, malgré le fait que la pratique de sage-femme soit axée sur le fait d’être « avec une femme » et que l’accent mis récemment sur le choix des consommateurs incombait au consommateur. Les visites de cas ont montré une forme de conversation moins hiérarchisée et plus parlante et ont corroboré les déclarations des femmes selon lesquelles ce modèle de soins leur offrait plus d’informations, plus de choix et de contrôle. La variation des schémas suggère que le contexte est une considération importante dans les recherches de ce type, l’environnement, tant au niveau micro que macro, et l’organisation des soins influençant le fonctionnement des concepts de choix et de consumérisme en pratique.

Abstract (English)  :

This study focused on patterns of communication between midwives and pregnant women and their implications for information, choice and control as now advocated in UK government policy. An earlier case-note audit evaluation of a new organisation of maternity care where midwives carry a personal caseload indicated no difference in quality standards of midwifery care from conventional care, yet women using the service gave a different view. In order to understand whether this difference might be an artefact of the research, responses to change, or a reflection of the limitations of using case notes for research, an observation-based study was conducted.

Forty interviews were observed in three UK settings: hospital clinic, GP clinic and women’s homes. Interviews were tape-recorded and notes and drawings of interaction made. The transcripts were analysed using structured and qualitative approaches. The interactional patterns differed according to model of care i.e. conventional or caseload, and setting of care. Several key ‘tasks’ in the visits were noted, with risk screening and health education information being dominant in conventional care. A continuum of styles of communication was identified, with the prevalent styles also differing according to location and organisation of care. The hierarchical and formal styles discussed in earlier sociological work were the most common in conventional care, despite the focus of midwifery on being ‘with-woman’ and the recent policy emphasis on consumer choice. The caseload visits showed a less hierarchical and more conversational form and supported women’s reports that this model of care offered them greater information, choice and control. The variation in patterns suggests that context is an important consideration in research of this type, with environment (both micro- and macro-level) and organisation of care influencing the ways in which the concepts of choice or consumerism operate in practice.

Sumário (português)  :

Este estudo se concentrou nos padrões de comunicação entre parteiras e mulheres grávidas e suas implicações para a informação, escolha e controle, como agora defendido na política do governo do Reino Unido. Uma avaliação de auditoria de notas de caso anterior de uma nova organização de assistência à maternidade, onde as parteiras carregam uma carga de casos pessoal, não indicou diferença nos padrões de qualidade e de assistência em obstetrícia dos cuidados convencionais, mas as mulheres que usam o serviço deram uma visão diferente. Para entender se essa diferença pode ser um artefato da pesquisa, respostas à mudança ou um reflexo das limitações do uso de notas de caso para a pesquisa, foi realizado um estudo baseado em observação.

Quarenta entrevistas foram observadas em três locais do Reino Unido: clínica hospitalar, clínica médica e domicílio para mulheres. As entrevistas foram gravadas e anotações e desenhos de interação realizados. As transcrições foram analisadas usando abordagens estruturadas e qualitativas. Os padrões interacionais diferiram de acordo com o modelo de atendimento, isto é, convencional ou com número de casos e com o local de atendimento. Várias ’tarefas’ importantes nas visitas foram anotadas, com a triagem de risco e as informações sobre educação em saúde dominando os cuidados convencionais. Um contínuo de estilos de comunicação foi identificado, com os estilos predominantes também diferindo de acordo com a localização e organização do atendimento. Os estilos hierárquicos e formais discutidos no trabalho sociológico anterior foram os mais comuns nos cuidados convencionais, apesar do foco da obstetrícia em estar com a mulher e da recente ênfase política na escolha do consumidor. As visitas de casos relatados mostraram uma forma menos hierárquica e mais conversacional e apoiaram os relatos de mulheres de que esse modelo de atendimento lhes oferecia mais informações, opções e controle. A variação nos padrões sugere que o contexto é uma consideração importante em pesquisas desse tipo, com o ambiente familiar (em nível micro e macro) e a organização do cuidado influenciando as maneiras pelas quais os conceitos de escolha ou consumismo operam na prática.

Resumen (español)  :

Full text (public) :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

L’analyse suggère qu’une plus grande attention portée aux questions de pouvoir et de hiérarchie, accompagnée de changements structurels, est nécessaire pour parvenir à une véritable réforme des services de santé et que les soins de maternité classiques ne peuvent actuellement pas être considérés comme axés sur les consommateurs ou les sages-femmes.

Argument (English):

The analysis suggests that greater attention to the issues of power and hierarchy, with consequent structural changes, are needed in order to achieve genuine health service reform and that mainstream maternity care cannot currently be said to be either consumer or midwife driven.

Argumento (português):

A análise sugere que é necessária uma maior atenção às questões de poder e hierarquia, com as consequentes mudanças estruturais, para alcançar uma reforma genuína dos serviços de saúde e que atualmente não se pode dizer que a assistência à maternidade convencional seja direcionada ao consumidor ou à parteira.

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ survey ; ethics

Author of this record :

Catherine Gerbelli — 26 Nov 2019
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 27 Nov 2019

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth