Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=3102 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Is it Time to Ask Whether Facility Based Birth is Safe for Low Risk Women and Their Babies? EClinicalMedicine, Commentary, Volume 14, page 9-10. |
Author(s) : | Hannah G. Dahlen |
Year of publication : | 2019 |
URL(s) : | https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/… |
Résumé (français) : | Les preuves à l’appui de la sécurité de l’accouchement à domicile pour les femmes à faible risque fréquentées par des sages-femmes ayant reçu une formation professionnelle dans des environnements bien intégrés sont maintenant très convaincantes. Peut-être devons-nous nous poser la question suivante : la naissance à l’hôpital est-elle sûre ou durable pour les femmes à faible risque des pays développés et en développement ? Pour emprunter cette voie, nous devons changer le récit enchâssé pour adopter une définition de la sécurité que les femmes comprennent et s’efforcent instinctivement, y compris la sécurité physique, psychologique, sociale, culturelle et spirituelle. Il est temps que nous reconnaissions la nécessité pour tous les groupes de professionnels et de consommateurs de maternité de s’unir et de s’entendre sur les principes fondamentaux nécessaires pour garantir aux femmes des options sûres lorsqu’elles choisissent leur lieu de naissance, quel que soit ce choix. |
Abstract (English) : | The evidence to support the safety of homebirth for low risk women attended by professionally educated midwives in well-integrated settings is now very convincing. Perhaps we need to ask: is hospital birth safe or sustainable for low risk women in developed and developing nations? To go down this path, we need to change the embedded narrative, to embrace a definition of safety that women instinctively understand and strive for, including physical, psychological, social, cultural and spiritual safety. It is time we recognized the need for all the professional and maternity consumer groups to unite and agree on the central principles needed to ensure women have safe options when they choose their place of birth, whatever that choice may be. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Full text (public) : | |
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | Il est temps que nous reconnaissions la nécessité pour tous les groupes de professionnels et de consommateurs de maternité de s’unir et de s’entendre sur les principes fondamentaux nécessaires pour garantir aux femmes des options sûres lorsqu’elles choisissent leur lieu de naissance, quel que soit ce choix. |
Argument (English): | It is time we recognize the need for all the professional and maternity consumer groups to unite and agree on the central principles needed to ensure women have safe options when they choose their place of birth, whatever that choice may be. |
Argumento (português): | Está na hora de reconhecermos a necessidade de todos os grupos de profissionais e de maternidades se unirem e concordarem com os princípios centrais necessários para garantir que as mulheres tenham opções seguras quando escolherem seu local de nascimento, qualquer que seja essa escolha. |
Argumento (español): | Es hora de que reconozcamos la necesidad de que todos los grupos de profesionales y consumidores de la maternidad se unan y acuerden los principios fundamentales necesarios para garantizar que las mujeres tengan opciones seguras al elegir su lugar de nacimiento, independientemente de cuál sea esa elección. |
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; guidelines ; public health ; planned homebirth ; hospital ; informed consent |
Author of this record : | Bernard Bel — 03 Nov 2019 |
Related records | |
---|---|
Group ‘Homebirth discussion’ | |
#3101 ⇔ | Eileen K.Hutton, Angela Reitsma, Julia Simioni, Ginny Brunton, Karyn Kaufman (2019). Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine, Volume 14, Pages 59-70. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=3101 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
21 Nov 2019 14:47 | [FR] Voir la discussion : « Attaquer l’accouchement à domicile est une conduite patriarcale » (Marie-Hélène Lahaye) http://marieaccouchela.net/index.php/2019/11/20/attaquer-laccouchement-a-domicile-est-une-conduite-patriarcale/ |
Bernard Bel |
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |