Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=295 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 May;22(3):294-5. |
Author(s) : | Mukhopadhyay M, Lim KJ, Fairlie FM. |
Year of publication : | 2002 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Slow release prostaglandin pessary (propess) is compared with instant release prostaglandin gel (prostin) for the induction of labour in nulliparous women with a modified Bishop’s score of less than 6. In this randomised study 50 women received prostin gel and 45 received propess. More than one dose of prostaglandin was required to achieve amniotomy more often in the propess group (53%) compared with the prostin group (34%) (P=0.03). Propess was unable to demonstrate any advantage over Prostin gel group. Propess was not cost-effective in this study. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | Le choix d’une prostaglandine pour le déclenchement |
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ physiology ; induction of labor ; rupture of membranes ; amniotomy ; active management of labor ; post-term pregnancy |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 22 Dec 2003 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |