[Scientific evidence on labor duration from systematic reviews] [Article in German] Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2003 Jan-Feb;207(1):17-23.

Choose your font:
✓ Arimo
➡ Merriweather
➡ Mukta Malar
➡ Open Sans Condensed
➡ Rokkitt
➡ Source Sans Pro

✓ English
➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español

	Database - (CIANE)
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) Currently 3111 records ➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=293 Created on : 22 Dec 2003 Modified on : 02 Dec 2007	➡ Modify this record Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password! Share: Hard
Bibliographical entry (without author) :	[Scientific evidence on labor duration from systematic reviews] [Article in German] Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2003 Jan-Feb;207(1):17-23.
Author(s) :	Gross MM, Antes G.
Year of publication :	2003
URL(s) :	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…
Résumé (français) :
Abstract (English) :	OBJECTIVE: We examined the evidence of systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on interventions that influence the duration of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the 208 Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth systematic reviews, 69 deal with labor and birth of which 20 address the effect of intrapartum interventions. We analyzed the reviews with respect to those interventions that affected the duration of birth. RESULTS: Six reviews, related to 5 interventions (amniotomy, epidural analgesia, continuous support, amnioinfusion, and maternal position), reported a significant effect on the duration of labor. Six found no significant effect on labor duration. The remaining eight reviews did not assess the effect of the intervention on labor duration. DISCUSSION: Interventions that have a significant influence on labor duration may interact with each other. Therefore, perinatal databases should ascertain not only if but also when an intervention has been performed.
Sumário (português) :
Resumen (español) :
Comments :
Argument (français) :	Les interventions ayant une influence sur la durée du travail s’influencent mutuellement. On ne peut donc pas les étudier comme des variables séparées.
Argument (English):
Argumento (português):
Argumento (español):
Keywords :	➡ attendance ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; position during labor ; physiology ; IV ; epidural ; rupture of membranes ; amniotomy ; active management of labor
Author of this record :	Cécile Loup — 22 Dec 2003

	Discussion (display only in English)

➡ Only identified users Click “login” on the top right to sign in or create your account I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth