Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2902 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Asynclitism: a literature review of an often forgotten clinical condition. Pubmed. 2015 |
Author(s) : | Malvasi A., Barbera A, Di Vagno G, Gimovsky A, Berghella V, Ghi T, Di Renzo GC, Tinelli A. |
Year of publication : | 2015 |
URL(s) : | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283847 |
Résumé (français) : | Etude de l’asynclitisme et de son diagnostic car ce défaut de la présentation ou de la progression peut mener à la césarienne. Présent essentiellement dans les variétés traverses et postérieures. |
Abstract (English) : | Asynclitism is defined as the “oblique malpresentation of the fetal head in labor“. Asynclitism is a clinical diagnosis that may be difficult to make; it may be found during vaginal examination. It is significant because it may cause failure of progress operative or cesarean delivery. We reviewed all literature for asynclitism by performing an extensive electronic search of studies from 1959 to 2013. All studies were first reviewed by a single author and discussed with co-authors. The following studies were identified: 8 book chapters, 14 studies on asynclitism alone and 10 papers on both fetal occiput posterior position and asynclitism. The fetal head in a laboring patient may be associated with some degree of asynclitism; this is seen as usual way of the fetal head to adjust to maternal pelvic diameters. However, marked asynclitism is often detected in presence of a co-existing fetal head malposition, especially the transverse and occipital posterior positions. Digital diagnosis of asynclitism is enhanced by intrapartum ultrasound with transabdominal or transperineal approach. The accurate diagnosis of asynclitism, in an objective way, may provide a better assessment of the fetal head position that will help in the correct application of vacuum and forceps, allowing the prevention of unnecessary cesarean deliveries. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | étude de l’asynclitisme sans prise en compte de la mobilisation pour réduire les dystocies d’engagement, à régler par extraction et non par césarienne |
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ c-section/caesarean ; prevention ; instrumental delivery ; forceps delivery ; vacuum extraction (ventouse) |
Author of this record : | Alison Passieux — 30 Jan 2018 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |