➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español
![[Valid RSS]](images/icons/valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=icon}
 | Database - (CIANE) |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) | |
|
https://ciane.net/id=2768 | ➡ Modify this record   Hard |
|
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Sequential Versus Concurrent Use of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Clinical Trial - - p.1 |
|
Author(s) : | El Sharkwy, I.A.E.; Noureldin, E.H.; Mohamed, E.A.E.; Shazly, S.A. |
|
Year of publication : | 2017 |
|
URL(s) : | |
|
Résumé (français) : |
|
|
Abstract (English) : | Background: To compare between the sequential and concurrent use of vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter for labor induction. Methods: This single-center, non-blinded randomized study was conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Zagazig University. A total of 160 women with full term singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation and bishop score ≤ 6 were randomized for labor induction with either concurrent or sequential use of vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter (80 cases in each group). The primary outcome measured was induction-to-delivery interval and secondary outcomes mesaured were vaginal delivery within 24 h, number of doses needed to induce labor, need of oxytocin for augmentation of labor, cesarean section rate, maternal or neonatal complications. Results: The mean induction-to-delivery interval was 22.33 ± 13.28 h versus 18.45 ± 14.34 h (p = 0.041) in sequential and concurrent group, respectively. The percentage of women who completed vaginal delivery within 24 h was 51% versus 61% (p = 0.046) in sequential and concurrent group, respectively. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups Conclusion: Concurrent use of vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter for labor induction was associated with shorter induction-to delivery interval compared to sequential use, and it increases the rate of vaginal delivery in the first 24 h. © 2017 Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India |
|
Sumário (português) : |
|
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
|
Comments : | |
|
Argument (français) : |
|
|
Argument (English): | |
|
Argumento (português): |
|
|
Argumento (español): |
|
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017 |
| Discussion (display only in English) | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice | ||
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
| Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |