Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2760 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Vol. 129, 3 - p.193-198 |
Author(s) : | Chen, W.; Xue, J.; Gaudet, L.; Walker, M.; Wen, S.W. |
Year of publication : | 2015 |
URL(s) : | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Background The effectiveness of Foley catheter plus misoprostol for cervical ripening has not been convincingly shown in trials. Objectives To summarize the evidence comparing Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Search strategy Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Collaboration databases were searched with the terms “Foley catheter,“ “misoprostol,“ “cervical ripening,“ and “labor induction.“ Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials comparing the methods of cervical ripening for delivery of a viable fetus were included. Data collection and analysis Study characteristics, quality, and outcomes were recorded. Random-effects models were used to combine data. Main results Eight trials were included, with 1153 patients overall. In a pooled analysis of seven high-quality studies, the combination group had a decreased time to delivery (mean difference -2.36 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.07 to -0.66; P = 0.007). Risk of chorioamnionitis was significantly increased in the combination group (risk ratio [RR] 2.07, 95% CI 1.04-4.13; P = 0.04), and that of tachysystole with fetal heart rate changes was decreased (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.91; P = 0.02). Frequency of cesarean did not differ (P = 0.77). Conclusions The combined use of Foley catheter and misoprostol results in a reduced time to delivery, a reduced frequency tachysystole with fetal heart rate changes, and an increased incidence of chorioamnionitis. © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ induction of labor ; ripening of cervix ; misoprostol (Cytotec) |
Author of this record : | Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |