Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2746 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: The PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth - ISBN: 14712393 (ISSN) - p.67 |
Author(s) : | ten Eikelder, M. L. G.; Neervoort, F.; Rengerink, K. O.; Jozwiak, M.; de Leeuw, J. W.; de Graaf, I.; van Pampus, M. G.; Franssen, M.; Oudijk, M.; van der Salm, P.; Woiski, M.; Pernet, P. J. M.; Feitsma, A. H.; van Vliet, H.; Porath, M.; Roumen, F.; van Beek, E.; Versendaal, H.; Heres, M.; Mol, B. W.; Bloemenkamp, K. W. |
Year of publication : | 2013 |
URL(s) : | https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/a… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Background: Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure. At present, different methods are used for induction of labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recently, we showed that in term women with an unfavorable cervix the use of a Foley catheter in comparison with vaginal Prostaglandin E2 gel, results in a comparable vaginal delivery rate. A meta-analysis on the subject indicated lower rates of hyperstimulation, and probably as a sequel fewer cases of postpartum haemorrhage. Misoprostol (PgE1) is another type of prostaglandin frequently used for labour induction, recommended by the international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO). Misoprostol can be administered by vaginal, rectal and oral route. There is evidence that oral administration results in less asphyxia and hyperstimulation than vaginal administration. At present, valid comparisons between oral misoprostol and Foley catheter are lacking. Therefore, we propose a randomised controlled trial comparing Foley catheter to oral misoprostol in order to assess safety and cost-effectiveness. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Full text (public) : | |
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | Les résultats de l’essai proposé contribueront à déterminer quelle méthode de déclenchement du travail est la plus sûre, la plus rentable et la plus adaptée aux patients, et aideront à élaborer des règles de bonne pratique fondées sur des données probantes. |
Argument (English): | Results of the proposed trial will contribute to the answer which method of induction of labour is most safe, cost-effective, and patient friendly and will help to construct evidence based guidelines. |
Argumento (português): | Os resultados do estudo proposto ajudarão a determinar o método mais seguro, mais eficaz em termos de custo e amigável ao paciente para iniciar o trabalho e ajudarão a desenvolver regras de boas práticas baseadas em evidências. |
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |