Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2517 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Vol. 274, 4 - ISBN: 0932-0067, 1432-0711 - p.222-226 |
Author(s) : | Nakai, Akihito; Yoshida, Atsuko; Yamaguchi, Satoru; Kawabata, Ikuno; Hayashi, Masako; Yokota, Akishige; Isozaki, Taichi; Takeshita, Toshiyuki |
Year of publication : | 2006 |
URL(s) : | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-00… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of severe perineal lacerations defined as either third- or fourth-degree lacerations during normal spontaneous vaginal delivery and to evaluate potential risk factors in Japanese patients. Materials and methods: An electronic audit of the perinatal database at the Tama-Nagayama Hospital of Nippon Medical School and Yamaguchi Hospital from 1997 through 2004 was completed. Singleton vaginal vertex deliveries were analyzed for potential risk factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: From the database, 7,946 deliveries were identified, with 135 deliveries resulting in severe lacerations (1.7%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, severe lacerations were associated significantly with primiparous (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.17–9.57), oxytocin use (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.27–3.73), midline episiotomy (odds ratio, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.09–11.55), forceps-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 7.11; 95% CI, 1.95–20.59), vacuum-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% CI, 3.38–10.36), and shorter attendant experience (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.12–9.81). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that operator factors, such as midline episiotomy, oxytocin use, assisted delivery and attendant experience, are independent risk for severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients. The results suggest that midline episiotomy and assisted vaginal delivery, especially forceps-assisted delivery should be avoided in patients who are being delivered of a first child whenever possible. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Import 02/08/2014 — 02 Aug 2014 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |