➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español
![[Valid RSS]](images/icons/valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=icon}
 | Database - (CIANE) |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) | |
|
https://ciane.net/id=2495 | ➡ Modify this record   Hard |
|
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Outcomes from medium term follow-up of patients with third and fourth degree perineal tears - Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology - Vol. 30, 6 - ISBN: 0144-3615 - p.609-612 |
|
Author(s) : | Bagade, P.; Mackenzie, S. |
|
Year of publication : | 2010 |
|
URL(s) : | http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/01443… |
|
Résumé (français) : |
|
|
Abstract (English) : | Third and fourth degree perineal tears have a considerable bearing on a woman’s future continence and quality of life. The RCOG recommends that all symptomatic women or those with abnormal anorectal manometric or endoanal ultrasonographic features should have the option of caesarean birth. We assessed the outcomes of 79 such women with regard to their symptoms, endoanal ultrasound and manometry findings at 6 months after delivery and the mode of delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Some 85% of the patients were asymptomatic. Five patients (42%) had faecal incontinence and the scarring was the commonest finding on endoanal ultrasound, irrespective of symptoms. The anal manometry showed reduced squeeze and resting pressures in proportionately higher numbers of symptomatic patients. A total of 12 patients underwent a caesarean section in their next pregnancy. Three patients had a repeat third degree tear. Among those who failed to keep the colorectal appointment, we conducted a telephonic questionnaire and found that most women (32 out of 33) were asymptomatic and three women were reluctant to be examined by a male doctor. We recommend appropriate identification, repair, physiotherapy and multidisciplinary follow-up in these patients to improve long-term outcomes. |
|
Sumário (português) : |
|
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
|
Comments : | |
|
Argument (français) : |
|
|
Argument (English): | |
|
Argumento (português): |
|
|
Argumento (español): |
|
|
Keywords : | ➡ episiotomy ; scars |
Author of this record : | Import 02/08/2014 — 02 Aug 2014 |
| Discussion (display only in English) | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice | ||
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
| Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |