Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2435

Created on : 07 Jan 2014
Modified on : 14 Jun 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Outcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: A retrospective cohort study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages 147–153

Author(s) :

Ellen Blixa, Anette Schaumburg Huitfeldtb, Pål Øiand, Bjørn Straumea, Merethe Kumle

Year of publication :

2012

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2012.10.001

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Background

The safety of planned home births remains controversial in Western countries. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes in women who planned, and were selected to, home birth at the onset of labor with women who planned for a hospital birth.

Methods

Data from 1631 planned home births between 1990 and 2007 were compared with a random sample of 16,310 low-risk women with planned hospital births. The primary outcomes were intrapartum intervention rates and complications. Secondary outcomes were perinatal and neonatal death rates.

Results

Primiparas who planned home births had reduced risks for assisted vaginal delivery (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.20–0.48), epidural analgesia (OR 0.21; CI 0.14–0.33) and dystocia (OR 0.40; CI 0.27–0.59). Multiparas who planned home births had reduced risks for operative vaginal delivery (OR 0.26; CI 0.12–0.56), epidural analgesia (OR 0.08; CI 0.04–0.16), episiotomy (OR 0.48; CI 0.31–0.75), anal sphincter tears (OR 0.29; CI 0.12–0.70), dystocia (OR 0.10; CI 0.06–0.17) and postpartum hemorrhage (OR 0.27; CI 0.17–0.41). We found no differences in cesarean section rate. Perinatal mortality rate was 0.6/1000 (CI 0–3.4) and neonatal mortality rate 0.6/1000 (CI 0–3.4) in the home birth cohort. In the hospital birth cohort, the rates were 0.6/1000 (CI 0.3–1.1) and 0.9/1000 (CI 0.5–1.5) respectively.

Conclusions

Planning for home births was associated with reduced risk of interventions and complications. The study is too small to make statistical comparisons of perinatal and neonatal mortality.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Full text (private) :

 ➡ Access requires authorization

Comments :

Argument (français) :

La planification des naissances à domicile était associée à une réduction du risque d’interventions et de complications.

Argument (English):

Planning for home births was associated with reduced risk of interventions and complications.

Argumento (português):

O planejamento para partos domiciliares foi associado à redução do risco de intervenções e complicações.

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ place of birth ; homebirth

Author of this record :

Bernard Bel — 07 Jan 2014
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 14 Jun 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth