Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2164 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Relationship of psychosocial status to low prenatal weight gain among nonobese black and white women delivering at term Obstet. Gynecol., Aug 1995; 86: 177 - 183. |
Author(s) : | CA Hickey, SP Cliver, RL Goldenberg, SF McNeal, HJ Hoffman |
Year of publication : | 1995 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of six indices of psychosocial well-being with low prenatal weight gain. METHODS: Scales assessing depression, trait anxiety, stress, mastery, self-esteem, and social support were self-administered at mid-pregnancy to 536 black and 270 white low-income, nonobese, multiparous women who subsequently delivered at term. All women had one or more risk factors for fetal growth restriction. The association of individual scale scores with prenatal weight gain values below current Institute of Medicine guidelines was examined while controlling for sociodemographic and reproductive variables, and for time between last weight observation and delivery. RESULTS: None of the scales were associated with low gain among black women. Among white women, poor scores (worst quartile) on four of the scales were associated with increased adjusted odds ratios for low gain, including 2.5 for high trait anxiety, 3.0 for increased levels of depression, 3.9 for low mastery, and 7.2 for low self-esteem. When scale scores and weight gain were examined as continuous variables, poor scores on five of the six scales were associated with lower weight gain values among white women (scores on the stress scale were the exception). CONCLUSION: These data suggest an important role for psychosocial factors in the etiology of low prenatal weight gain among white women but show no such role for black women. Along with reports of wide inter-individual variability in the energy costs of pregnancy, these data also suggest that attempts to manipulate pregnancy weight gain through dietary means will meet with variable success until psychosocial and other factors affecting prenatal energy intake and/or utilization are further delineated. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Emmanuelle Phan — 19 Feb 2008 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |