Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2023 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Management of prolonged pregnancy: a randomized trial of induction of labour and antepartum foetal monitoring. {Inde}. Natl Med J India. 2001 Sep-Oct;14(5):270-3. |
Author(s) : | James C, George SS, Gaunekar N, Seshadri L. |
Year of publication : | 2001 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | BACKGROUND: The two methods of management of prolonged pregnancy, induction of labour and expectant management with foetal surveillance, have pros and cons. Therefore, we compared the induction of labour with serial antenatal foetal monitoring in the management of post-term pregnancy. METHODS: Seventy-four women with uncomplicated pregnancy at 41 weeks (287 days) of gestation were randomly assigned to undergo either induction of labour or serial antenatal foetal monitoring. Labour was induced in the latter group whenever there was evidence of foetal compromise. Antenatal monitoring consisted of the foetal kick count, non-stress test and biophysical profile. RESULTS: Fifty-seven per cent of women went into spontaneous labour by 41 weeks and 4 days (291 days) of gestation and only 14% developed foetal compromise before that. However, when the gestational age was more than 41 weeks and 4 days (291 days), the incidence of meconium staining of amniotic fluid and evidence of uteroplacental insufficiency increased significantly. The rate of caesarean section, instrumental delivery, foetal distress and duration of labour did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The policy of inducing labour at 41 weeks and 4 days (291 days of gestation) in uncomplicated pregnancies is justified in our population. However, foetal monitoring should begin at 41 weeks of gestation. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 17 Mar 2007 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |