Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1992

Created on : 07 Sep 2006
Modified on : 10 Jan 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

‘Nesting’ and ‘Matrescence’ as distinctive features of a free-standing birth centre in the UK. Midwifery (2006) 22, 228–239.

Author(s) :

Denis J. Walsh

Year of publication :

2006

URL(s) :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=‘Nesti…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.09.005

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Objective: to explore the culture, beliefs, values, customs and practices around the birth process within a free-standing birth centre (FSBC).

Design: ethnography.

Setting: a birth centre situated in the midlands of England.

Participants: women attending the centre, midwives and maternity-care assistants(MCAs) working at the centre.

Findings: women in the study seemed to invoke intuitive nesting-related behaviours in their assessment of the suitability of the birth centre. In addition, the birth centre staff’s focus on creating the right ambience for birth may also emanate from nesting concerns. Birth-centre staff assisted women through the ‘becoming mother’ transition, which is conceptualised as ‘matrescent’ care.

Key conclusions: the birth-centre environment elicited nesting-like behaviours from both women and staff. This formed part of a nurturing orientation that was conceptualised as ‘matrescent’ (becoming mother) care. ‘Matrescence’ does not seem to be grounded in clinical skills but is relationally mediated. Implications for practice: nesting-like behaviours and ‘matrescent’ care in this context challenge maternity services to review traditional conceptualisations of safety and traditional expressions of clinical intrapartum care.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Full text (private) :

 ➡ Access requires authorization

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ place of birth ; birthing center birthing centers ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; psychology

Author of this record :

Bernard Bel — 07 Sep 2006
➡ latest update : Alison Passieux — 10 Jan 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth