Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1741

Created on : 01 Feb 2006
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

➡ Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

VBAC: to induce or not to induce. AJOG, 184, p.1122

Author(s) :

Sims

Year of publication :

2001

URL(s) :

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Prospective, observational analysis of 505 pts with Hex of previous CS. Three cohorts developed: repeat CS without TOL (269), spontaneous trial of labor (179) and induced trial of labor (57). VBAC successful in 77% of those in spon labor versus 57.9% of induced labor. Uterine scar separation more common in induced group (7%) than in the repeat CS group (1.5%) Conclusion: Induction of labor in women attempting VBAC is associated with a significantly reduced rate of successful vaginal delivery and an increased risk of serious maternal morbidity.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Fiche importée de http://www.worldserver.com/turk/birthing/rrvbac2000-4.html avec l’aide de Ken Turkowski, septembre 2005

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ vaginal birth after caesarean ; c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; post-term pregnancy

Author of this record :

Ken Turkowski — 01 Feb 2006