Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1711

Created on : 01 Feb 2006
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

➡ Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Is VBAC safe? Experience at a community hospital. AJOG, 184, p.1478

Author(s) :

Blanchette

Year of publication :

2001

URL(s) :

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

4-year prospective, cohort in a community hospital. Total number of PCS were 1481, 727 had ERCS whereas 754 attempted VBAC. Found that the attempted VBAC rate declined significantly in the last two years. There were 2 neonatal deaths caused by uterine rupture. 12 uterine ruptures occurred for a rate of 1.6% and 11 of the 12 ruptures involved with induction or augmentation of labor. Conclusions: VBAC is safe provided that induction of labor is not used.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Fiche importée de http://www.worldserver.com/turk/birthing/rrvbac2000-4.html avec l’aide de Ken Turkowski, septembre 2005

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ vaginal birth after caesarean ; c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; post-term pregnancy

Author of this record :

Ken Turkowski — 01 Feb 2006