Neonatal morbidity after ERCS and TOL.. Pediatrics, 100, p.348

Choose your font:
✓ Arimo
➡ Merriweather
➡ Mukta Malar
➡ Open Sans Condensed
➡ Rokkitt
➡ Source Sans Pro

✓ English
➡ Français
➡ Português
➡ Español

	Database - (CIANE)
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) Currently 3111 records ➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1596 Created on : 01 Feb 2006 Modified on : 01 Dec 2007	➡ Modify this record Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password! Share: Hard
Bibliographical entry (without author) :	Neonatal morbidity after ERCS and TOL.. Pediatrics, 100, p.348 - 53
Author(s) :	Hook
Year of publication :	1997
URL(s) :
Résumé (français) :
Abstract (English) :	Retro. All mothers who underwent PCS and delivered singleton infants at term were identified. Neonatal outcomes were compared between infants delivered by ERCS (#497) and those delivered by TOL (#492). Also compared were those successful with TOL (#336) and failed TOL (#156). A cohort of routine vaginal delivery was identified also.<BR>Results: Infants delivered by ERCS had an increased rate of transient tachypnea compared with TOL. Compared with routine delivery the odds ratio of transient tachypnea was 2.6. In addition, 2 infants delivered by ERCS had RDS. Infants delivered after TOL had an increased rate of suspected and proven sepsis (5% suspected for TOL vs 2% for ERCS, 1% proven sepsis for TOL vs 0.1% proven sepsis for ERCS). Compared with successful TOL, infants of failed TOL had more neonatal morbidity and had a longer hosp. stay. The odds ratio of developing respiratory illness after failed TOL was 2.1, for suspected sepsis was 4.8 and for proven sepsis was 19.3.<BR>Conc. Infants born by ERCS are at increased risk for developing respiratory problems. TOL is associated with increased rates of suspected and proven sepsis. This appears to be limited to those infants delivered by CS after failed TOL.
Sumário (português) :
Resumen (español) :
Comments :	Fiche importée de http://www.worldserver.com/turk/birthing/rrvbac2000-4.html avec l’aide de Ken Turkowski, septembre 2005
Argument (français) :
Argument (English):
Argumento (português):
Argumento (español):
Keywords :	➡ vaginal birth after caesarean ; c-section/caesarean
Author of this record :	Ken Turkowski — 01 Feb 2006

	Discussion (display only in English)

➡ Only identified users Click “login” on the top right to sign in or create your account I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth