Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3111 records
➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1170

Created on : 21 Apr 2005
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

➡ Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Positions during labour. Br Med J. 1963 Jan 12;5323:100-2.

Author(s) :

Chan DP.

Year of publication :

1963

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Method
Alternate primigravidae were assigned to one of two groups during the first stage of labour.Women in group A were kept in the erect position during first stage of labour; women in group B were kept in bed in the lateral or dorsal position during
rst stage of labour. During second stage, women in group A (study group)were propped up to 45-60 degrees in the delivery bed. Women in group B (control) delivered in the dorsal position

Participants
200 women, Hong Kong.
100 study participants.
100 control participants.
Singleton and twin pregnancies were included (one twin pregnancy in the study group).

Intervention
Study group: 100 women were kept ambulatory during the
rst stage of labour and were propped up to 45-60 degrees in the bed during the second stage of labour.
Control group: 100 women were kept in a supine or lateral position during the
rst of labour and in the dorsal position during the second stage of labour.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

La présentation de l’étude en anglais provient du full article fiche AFAR 1099 (revue systématique)

Argument (français) :

Etude prise en compte dans la revue systémtatique Cochrane Gupta 2004 (fiche afar 1099)? dans celle de Vendittelli 1998 (Fiche AFAR 2042) et dans la revue Cochrane de Nikodem (2000)

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; physiology ; position during labor

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 21 Apr 2005