Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=1162 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Maternal half-sitting position in the second stage of labor. J Perinat Med. 1983;11(6):286-9. |
Author(s) : | Marttila M, Kajanoja P, Ylikorkala O. |
Year of publication : | 1983 |
URL(s) : | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=… |
Résumé (français) : | Comparaison entre la position demi-assise et la position couchée pendant la seconde phase du travail. 100 femmes à accouchant à terme ont été randomisées après la phase de dilatation passée en position de décubitus dorsal. La moitié ont fini l’accouchement en position demi-assise (n=50) ou décubitus dorsal (n=50). La durée totale de la seconde phase du travail et la durée de la poussée active ne sont pas différents entre les deux groupes. Les ventouses ont été nécessaires deux fois (4%) dans le groupe en position demi-assise et six fois (12%) dans le groupe allongé. Une femme de chaque groupe a eu une déchirure vaginale. Des [early decelerations in fetal cardiotocography] ont été vues 22 fois dans le groupe demi-assis et 14 fois dans le groupe allongé (P inférieur à 0, 05). Cependant, des [late decelerations] ont été détectées chez une seule femme du groupe demi-assis, contre cinq femmes du groupe allongé. Quatre enfants du groupe allongé avait un Apgar à une minute inférieur ou égal à 7, alors que tous ceux du groupe demi-assis avaient des scores supérieurs à 7. L’appréciation subjective des mères est en faveur de la position demi-assise. La conclusion est que les femmes peuvent accoucher en position demi-assise sans qu’il y ait de risque maternels ou fœtaux. |
Abstract (English) : | The maternal half-sitting and supine position during the second stage of fullterm labor was compared in 100 women who, after identical opening phases in supine position, randomly delivered in half-sitting (50 degrees, n = 50) or supine position (n = 50). The whole duration of the second stage of labor or the time spent in active pushing did not differ between the groups. Vacuum extraction was needed twice (4%) in the group delivering in half-sitting and six times (12%) in the group delivering in supine position. Vaginal tear occurred in one mother in both groups. Early decelerations in fetal cardiotocography were seen 22 times in half-sitting and 14 times in supine group (p less than 0.05). However, late decelerations were seen in only one mother with half-sitting, as compared to five mothers with supine position. Four infants of mothers giving birth in supine position had 1 minute APGAR scores 7 or less, whereas all infants of mothers delivering in half-sitting position had APGAR scores higher than 7. Subjectively the mothers liked more the half-sitting position. We conclude that a women can deliver in half-sitting position without maternal or fetal risks. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Full text (public) : | |
Comments : | Position demi-assise comparée (50 femmes) à la position allongée sur le dos (50 femmes) pendant le second stade du travail. La position assise a entraîné 3 fois moins d’extractions instrumentales, plus de décélérations cardiaques foetales au début [de la seconde phase?], moins après [pendant l’expulsion?] , Apgar meilleur ou aussi bon que pour les enfants nés d’une mère allongée. |
Argument (français) : | La conclusion est que les femmes peuvent accoucher en position demi-assise sans qu’il y ait de risque maternels ou fœtaux. |
Argument (English): | We conclude that a women can deliver in half-sitting position without maternal or fetal risks. |
Argumento (português): | A conclusão é que as mulheres podem dar à luz em posição semi-sentada sem risco materno ou fetal. |
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; position during labor ; perineal/vaginal tears ; fetal distress ; vacuum extraction (ventouse) ; dilation |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 21 Apr 2005 |
Related records | |
---|---|
Group ‘Discussion of birth chair’ | |
#1158 | Stewart P, Hillan E, Calder AA. (1983). A randomised trial to evaluate the use of a birth chair for delivery. Lancet. 1983 Jun 11;1(8337):1296-8. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1158 |
------ out of group ------ | |
Pinned by #975 | Crowley P, Elbourne D, Ashurst H, Garcia J, Murphy D, Duignan N. (1991). Delivery in an obstetric birth chair: a randomized controlled trial. Br-J-Obstet-Gynaecol. 1991 Jul; 98(7): 667-74 ➡ https://ciane.net/id=975 |
Pinned by #1099 | Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ. (2004). Position for women during second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002006. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1099 |
Pinned by #1113 | SZ Chen, K Aisaka, H Mori, and T Kigawa (1987). Effects of sitting position on uterine activity during labor Obstetrics & Gynecology 69:67-73 ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1113 |
Pinned by #1122 | De Jonge A, Teunissen TA, Lagro-Janssen AL. (2004). Supine position compared to other positions during the second stage of labor: a meta-analytic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Mar;25(1):35-45. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1122 |
Pinned by #1165 | Waldenstrom U, Gottvall K. (1991). A randomized trial of birthing stool or conventional semirecumbent position for second-stage labor. Birth. 1991 Mar;18(1):5-10. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1165 |
Pinned by #1175 | Hemminki E, Virkkunen A, Makela A, et al. (1986). A trial of delivery in a birth chair. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1986;6:162-5. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1175 |
Pinned by #1176 | Kafka M, Riss P, von Trotsenburg M, Maly Z. (1994). Gebärhocker - ein geburtshilfliches Risiko? [The birthing stool--an obstetrical risk?] [Article in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1994 Sep;54(9):529-31. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1176 |
Pinned by #1189 | Shannahan MD, Cottrell BH. (1985). Effect of the birth chair on duration of second stage labor, fetal outcome, and maternal blood loss. Nurs Res. 1985 Mar-Apr;34(2):89-92. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1189 |
Pinned by #1193 | Stewart P, Spiby H. (1989). A randomized study of the sitting position for delivery using a newly designed obstetric chair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Mar;96(3):327-33. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1193 |
Pinned by #1317 | Racinet, Claude (2005). Positions maternelles pour l’accouchement. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Jul-Aug;33(7-8):533-8 ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1317 |
Pinned by #2042 | Vendittelli F. (1998). Position allongée ou verticale durant le 2e stade du travail : revue des méta-analyses. 28e Journées de la Société française de Médecine Périnatale, Arnette Ed., Paris, 1998, 167-176. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=2042 |
Group ‘Discussion of birth chair’ | |
Pinned by #1163 | Turner MJ, Romney ML, Webb JB, Gordon H. (1986). The Birthing Chair: an obstetric hazard? J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth 1986;6:232-5. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1163 |
Pinned by #1177 | Liddell HS, Fisher PR. (1985). The birthing chair in the second stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;25(1):65-8. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=1177 |
Pinned by #3032 | Li Thies-Lagergren (2013). The Swedish Birth Seat Trial. Thesis. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. ➡ https://ciane.net/id=3032 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |