Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=1105 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | Practice styles. A comparison of obstetricians and nurse-midwives. J Nurse Midwifery. 1996 May-Jun;41(3):243-50. |
Author(s) : | Fullerton JT, Hollenbach KA, Wingard DL. |
Year of publication : | 1996 |
URL(s) : | |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Iain Chalmers and the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, England, developed a comprehensive listing of perinatal care procedures shown to reduce the frequency of adverse outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth. This list was used as a framework for a pilot study conducted in 1992 that reviewed similarities and differences in opinion and practice style between certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and obstetrician/gynecologists. Twenty CNMs and 57 obstetrician/gynecologists who were active clinical practitioners in San Diego commented on 24 items drawn from Chalmers’ work. The CNMs were more likely to favor the availability of social and psychological support variables and to use them in their practice. The groups were more alike than different in their views concerning preventive interventions during the prenatal period. CNMs were more likely to support the availability of alternatives to maternal positions for labor and birth, exhalatory breathing, and delayed pushing and less likely to support the availability of electronic fetal monitoring, epidural anesthesia, episiotomy, and active management of the third stage. A small sample size and limited response rate restricted interpretation and generalizability of these data. Nevertheless the data offer support for other studies with similar findings. They also suggest that health system administrators should inform women and families about differences in practice styles before families select from among the various insurance options that may, in the end, restrict the choice of provider or birth setting. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : | Les différences de pratique entre les sages-femmes et les obstétriciens. |
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | ➡ attendance ; position during labor ; guidelines ; psychology ; physiology ; duration of labour ; ethics ; deontology ; informed consent ; episiotomy ; epidural ; active management of labor |
Author of this record : | Cécile Loup — 31 Mar 2005 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
[Hide guidelines] ➡ Discussion guidelines 1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic 2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors 3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories 4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice |
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |