Database - (CIANE) | |
Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website) |
https://ciane.net/id=2827 | ➡ Modify this record |
Bibliographical entry (without author) : | A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Vol. 114, 10 - p.1215-1221 |
Author(s) : | Nassar, A.H.; Awwad, J.; Khalil, A.M.; Abu-Musa, A.; Mehio, G.; Usta, I.M. |
Year of publication : | 2007 |
URL(s) : | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Objective: To compare patient satisfaction with two routes of misoprostol for term labour induction. Design: Prospective randomised trial. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Population: A total of 170 women admitted at ≥37 weeks of gestation for induction of labour. Methods: Women were randomised to receive 50 micrograms of either sublingual or vaginal misoprostol. Main outcome measures: Patient satisfaction with the route of administration. Results: Despite a similar proportion reporting the labour induction as more painful than expected in both groups, a significantly lower proportion mentioned that the pelvic examinations were very painful in the sublingual group (19.7 versus 36.1%, relative risk [RR] 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9). Request for analgesia was similar in both groups. More women in the sublingual group thought that the labour experience was better than expected (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3), had a positive attitude towards induction in subsequent pregnancies (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3) and preferred the same route in subsequent pregnancies (RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.2-4.5). Mean number of misoprostol doses, oxytocin augmentation, tachysystole and hyperstimulation, induction to vaginal delivery interval, vaginal delivery after a single dose, vaginal birth within 12 and 24 hours, and caesarean delivery rates were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Sublingual misoprostol (50 micrograms) is associated with a significantly higher patient satisfaction rate compared with a similar dose of vaginal misoprostol. Sublingual administration offers additional choice to women, in particular those wishing to avoid vaginal administration. © RCOG 2007 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : |
|
Comments : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): | |
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): |
|
Keywords : | |
Author of this record : | Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017 |
Discussion (display only in English) | ||
---|---|---|
New expert query --- New simple query
Creating new record --- Importing records
User management --- Dump database --- Contact
This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
➡ Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
➡ Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth |