Base de datos - (CIANE) | |
Presentación de esta base de datos documental (Sitio web de CIANE) |
https://ciane.net/id=2451 | ➡ Editar este registro |
Ficha bibliográfica (sin autores) : | Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Vol. 284, 2 - ISBN: 0932-0067, 1432-0711 - p.275-280 |
Autores : | Kokanalı, Demet; Ugur, Mustafa; Kokanalı, M. Kuntay; Karayalcın, Rana; Tonguc, Esra |
Año de publicación : | 2011 |
URL(s) : | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-01… |
Résumé (français) : |
|
Abstract (English) : | Purpose To compare different repair techniques and different suture materials for episiotomy. Methods 160 women having vertex delivery with right-mediolateral episiotomy were randomly allocated to four groups. In the groups where continuos technique was performed, vaginal mucosa, perineal muscles and the skin were sutured continuously. In the groups of interrupted technique, vaginal mucosa was sutured with continuous sutures, then muscle layers and skin were closed by interrupted sutures. Two different types of synthetic absorbed suture material were used: monofilament type is in form of polyglycolide-co-caprolactone and multifilament one is polyglactin 910-Rapide. Perineal pain during different activities on the first and tenth day postpartum and also during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery was questioned by visual analogous scale (VAS). Furthermore, repair time, amount of suture and episiotomy complications were investigated in each groups. Results On the first day after delivery, the perineal pain scores, the repair time, the amount of suture were statistically less in the continuous technique groups. The differences between the pain at tenth day and during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery were statistically same. Conclusions The continuous suturing techniques for episiotomy closure, compared to interrupted methods, are associated with less short-term pain, are quicker and also need less suture material. |
Sumário (português) : |
|
Resumen (español) : | |
Comentarios : | |
Argument (français) : |
|
Argument (English): |
|
Argumento (português): |
|
Argumento (español): | |
Palabras claves : | |
Autor de este registro : | Import 02/08/2014 — 02 Aug 2014 |
Debate (mostrar sólo español) | ||
---|---|---|
Realizar otra consulta de expertos --- Realice otra consulta sencilla
Creación de un registro --- Importación de registros
Gestión de usuarios --- Salvaguardar la base de datos --- Contacto
Esta base de datos creada por la Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) está gestionada
por el Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
Se nutre de las contribuciones de voluntarios interesados en compartir información científica.
Si está de acuerdo con este proyecto, puede ayudarnos de varias maneras:
(1) convertirse en colaborador de esta base de datos, si tiene alguna experiencia en documentación
(2) ou apoio financeiro CIANE (veja abaixo)
(3) o hacerse miembro de otra asociación afiliada al CIANE.
➡ Inicie sesión o cree una cuenta para seguir los cambios o convertirse en editor.
➡ Contacta con bibli(arobase)ciane.net para más información.
Donar a CIANE (haga clic en 'Faire un don') nos ayudará a mantener y desarrollar sitios y bases de datos públicas para apoyar las decisiones informadas de los progenitores y profesionales de la salud con respecto al parto |